According to the Weekly Times this week, the Bureau of Meteorology has restricted access to bushfire weather information to fire agencies and volunteers. Last summer the public could at least access the fire danger indexes for specific weather stations, now we can’t even do that.

It insults the intelligence of the community to say it would be too confusing to provide this information. No doubt some bushfire weather information would not be easily understood by lay people, but to only provide the simplest information, catering to the lowest common denominator is dangerous. It smacks of power and control and the cult of expert, which besets the bushfire industry. It perfectly illustrates the modern dilemma of government that tells its citizens to take responsibility for themselves, but restricts access to the one thing that could assist their survival.

There are so many ways that the Bureau of Meteorology could provide really useful information for the public about bushfire weather, but apart from the fire danger rating, we are sent around and around the BOM website, to educational information, historical information, but nothing that gives up to date, practical and useful information. The fear of someone actually relying on some information that is provided is at such a paranoid level, only the vague and general can be provided. Is it any wonder that when we are told the fire danger is a certain level, we look out the window and say “but its not like that here”. And so we don’t act, we ignore the little bit of information we are given because it doesn’t relate to us. The BOM and the fire agencies don’t give us ways of applying information to our own circumstances, we are spoon fed a one size fits all pill – because then the burden of responsibility can be shifted – to us.

Posted in Bushfire Preparations, Community, Government, Weather | 2 Comments

Great discussion on Bush Telegraph of preparing psychologically for facing a bushfire.
Click here to listen.

Posted in Bushfire Preparations, Children, Psychology | 1 Comment

Here is a video from the Bureau of Meteorology explaining new weather information systems used to determine fire risk. It also explains a new fire danger index being trialed in Victoria this summer.

Posted in Weather | Leave a comment
Posted in Bushfire Preparations, Fire Refuges | Leave a comment

Some things never change.  The fire season comes around every year and as the grass grows so does my tension -there is always a mismatch  between what needs to happen and what is happening.

This is the first blog I posted on Fire In Mind in October 2009.  It was eliminated when I deleted the entire blog framework in about February 2010.  Fortunately I had a copy in Word and I thought it was appropriate at this time of year, to post it again.

The first blog!  I have circled round and round this task like a shark around a rowing boat.  Not because I didn’t want to do it, just that typical procrastination when a task appears a little overwhelming and you don’t quite know where to start.

Reminds me a lot of my first year or two living in a bushfire prone area and not knowing where to start.  Everywhere I looked there were jobs screaming at me.  Our house is treated-pine weatherboard, 25 years old and almost peeling off the house on the north sided.   The baseboards boast great warping that leaves gaps the size of a house for embers to fly in and ignite all that “stuff” so conveniently stored there.

And as I discovered is the nature of being overwhelmed, if I talked about the problem with anyone, there was no way through.  It didn’t matter what they suggested, I had a counter argument as to why their solution was not enough, wouldn’t work or might work for that part but the real problem was something else.  With my head in my hands I could see only doom and gloom.

Eventually though the pressure mounted and we just had to do something, start somewhere, tackle one bit, one job.  We decided to start from the house outwards and we cut back any trees or bushes touching the house and cleaned up all the leaves and grass nearby.

I’m not sure if we had a fight in the process, no doubt we had words, the typical tension being my full on drive to get it all done at break next speed, and Adrian’s methodical steady paced and planned process.

But we managed to get through the day and it felt so good to look at our work.  I felt we were a bit more conscious of our immediate environment and its inherent risk – and the place looked great.  It was the first step in that journey of 1000 miles. (And I reckon we have about 9923 to go.)

Posted in Bushfire Preparations | Leave a comment

Below is an article I came across on the website: INsite It is a warm and heartfelt look at the work that went on in the days and weeks immediatley after the Black Saturday bushfires.  Thanks to Darragh O Keefe from INsite for permission to publish the article.

Jane Furey won’t ever forget her first day working for the Victorian Bushfire Case Management Service. “The first day I drove to Whittlesea, at the foot of the King Lake ranges, I met with a colleague from Benetas who had volunteered a week earlier. I had been given clients’ names and addresses, but very few people had phones. I said I’d be fine, but he insisted on driving me through the fire affected area. It’s not like it is on TV or in the papers, he said. Once we started to drive up the hill, it was like a bomb had gone off. It was horrendous; totally black. There were blackened, burnt out cars on the side of the road, and we knew people had died in them. There were rows of melted houses, with some randomly intact here and there. There were no street signs left, anywhere. The streets and roads were obliterated. On the main road, there were police markings, indicating where people had died. As we drove through, I just sat and cried. Then I thought to myself, pull yourself together Jane and get to work.”

Furey, and seven fellow community care managers from Benetas, had volunteered to be seconded to the service after it was established following the Victorian Black Saturday disaster.

In announcing the service, Victorian Premier John Brumby and Minister for Community Services Jenny Macklin said: “Each affected family will be given the name and phone number of a person they can call who can give them the help they need to get their lives back on track”.

Despite having case managed in the community for 15 years, Furey said the new challenges she faced were immense.

“I had no idea where anything was. There was a lot of confusion. I had clients who had lost family members, and children. They had lost houses, pets. I had a number of fire fighters; big mountain men with beards. They didn’t want counselling; instead they would self medicate – with drink or drugs. They had all lost their houses. The fact they couldn’t protect their friends and family had a profound impact on them. For two of them, it had been their first fire,” says Furey.

Unlike community care, where you can make a profound difference in a client’s life very quickly, Furey had to adjust to the slow and difficult nature of her new role; working with clients of different ages, all traumatised and many not reacting in the usual manner.

“Often, they could not remember information or simply couldn’t comprehend. I could not make even basic assumptions that they could cope on any level.”

Like the other case managers, Furey was responsible for a range of tasks including identifying and prioritising the needs of individuals and their families, informing them about their eligibility to financial grants and support services, determining other individual need and providing personal support and understanding. She was the point of contact for everything – from food and blankets to counselling and support.

Unsurprisingly, many case managers experienced emotional fatigue, described by Furey as the cost of bearing witness to such devastation compounded by the inability to change the situation. It led to burnout for many, especially the younger case managers.

Therefore, having effective strategies for supporting the case managers was crucial.

Helen Brightman, Benetas manager of community care southern region, took on a supervisory role, overseeing the eight Benetas case managers and ensuring they had access to the necessary training and support.

“My role was mainly supporting our case managers and liasing between them and the other agencies involved. I attended monthly Department of Human Services (DHS) management meetings and the VBCMS evaluation reference group, and met regularly with the case managers to pass on information,” she says.

“Part of my role was also ensuring they were ok, that they were copying with their workload and their clients. Given the nature of the work, we would often just chat about how they were going, did they feel they needed counselling or additional support. Keeping them in the loop was important, so I would keep them up to date on what was happening in Benetas, how their team was going.”

DHS also assigned each case manager a team quality manager, who met with them and their supervisors on a fortnightly basis and allocated cases, ensured policies and protocols were followed and monitored case outcomes. Complimenting this, each case manager attended monthly forums within each DHS region and participated in numerous training sessions.

Furey says the training was a highlight. Many sessions with clinical psychologist Rob Gordon were held, covering resilience training, mental health and suicide, drugs and alcohol, grief and loss and financial management.

“The training helped to make us resilient. I noticed how resilient my clients were, and how resilient I was going to have to be. Working in continual crisis takes an emotional and physical toll. You can’t help but be affected by it, unless you are a robot. You do what you can to protect yourself, but it’s very difficult,” Furey says.

“The education and training was reactive, but in a good way,” says Brightman. “As issues arose for the case workers we would arrange training. It was done on a regular basis, often once a month. All the case managers said the training was invaluable and very worthwhile.”

For those involved, it has been a rewarding experience.

Furey says she learned to do things she never thought she would have to, like how to sink a bore and getting land cleared and ready for houses.

Dealing with a challenging client group, in such profoundly difficult circumstances, means she has, of course, gained valuable new professional skill and experience.

But the experience has been deeper than that, she says.

“I learned I’m more resilient than I thought I was. I can work in continual crisis for a long period, 18 months, and that’s no mean feat. The experience has changed me. It’s made me more compassionate. Not that I wasn’t compassionate before, I guess just more so, on a different level. It also hardened me in some ways.

“I’ve worked with a client group that’s not my normal demographic – warm, welcoming and wonderful people who’d been to hell and back. And I’m incredibly grateful for that.”

Posted in Community, Psychology, Through and out the other side, Understanding Fire | Leave a comment

“The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind The answer is blowin’ in the wind”  Bob Dylan, US songwriter

If the wind will not serve, take to the oars”

Latin proverb

“It is the set of the sails, not the direction of the wind that determines which way we will go.”  Jim Rohn, US author

Following on and possibly in complete contradiction to my last post, I have been reminding myself that I do know a lot about fire. I build fires regularly. Our home is heated almost entirely by a wood heater, so during winter I constantly build and tend a fire.  And before the bushfire season, every year we do some burning off.  (Although last year to reduce our burning, we hired a huge skip and sent most of the fuel to be turned into mulch – seems like a much better option than burning).

Every time I light or tend a fire I apply knowledge and information about the nature of fire to the process.  Its almost an intuitive process now, a delicate balance of fuel, placement and draught.  But many of us don’t recognise this knowledge or its usefulness in understanding bushfire behaviour around our homes.

Three things affects bushfire behaviour –  fuel, weather and topography.

Important principles relating to bushfire fuel are:

  • Fine fuel (fuel less than the thickness of a pencil) burns quicker and faster
  • Fuel needs to be arranged in close proximity to other fuel for fire to burn on, but not so close that air is unable to fan the fire.
  • Fire burns up so flames and heat from something below will ignite something above
  • The more fuel there is the hotter and bigger the fire, and
  • Moisture content affects flammability, so dead fuel burns more easily.

I can understand and apply all of this, which is great because it is the one thing I have some control over.  It is really only the nature of wind, which for me is harder to understand and predict.

Maybe I missed the sessions in school that looked at weather or maybe because its invisible, but never ‘got’ wind.  It was a complete revelation to me when I recently read in a weather book that air moves in masses. Blocks, or areas, of air become/form/dissolve as entities.  I always thought about air as dissipated, just one big mass, not an interconnected, always changing network of many forming and un-forming units.

And of course it is a complete understatement to say it is ‘only the nature of wind’ I don’t understand, because wind is the biggest influencing weather factor on bushfire behaviour, ahead of humidity and lastly temperature.  This has been recently reported by a Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre news release.

So to understand how fire might move around my house I need to understand and apply the principles of fuel, and prepare based on this.  And I also need to understand the relationship of my house to the flamezone, and topography.  And to understand how fire might move in the landscape (which allows to me to make informed decisions about what to do and when), I need to understand wind.  For me this means understanding the big picture and then applying it to the world I live in.  So its back to the weather book!

Have you got any short cuts or simple ways of understanding bushfire behaviour?

Posted in Bushfire Preparations, Understanding Fire, Weather | 1 Comment

It is school holidays here in Victoria and I took my three children (without my partner who has an unnatural aversion to holidays) to stay for a week at Wilson’s Promontory. It was essentially luxury camping. We were staying in a one-room hut with a fridge, a stove, running water and best of all a heater!

We went with 5 other families (no, they were not all in the one room hut) from my gardening group. It was the first time we had gone away together and it was a great success. We spent the days relaxing, walking, cooking, looking after kids and playing 500.

The Prom is beautiful. The variety of natural environments is amazing and while the sun rarely made an appearance, the wildflowers were out. There were seemingly hundreds of shades of blushing pink heath and varieties of intricate native orchids. The scenery is imposing – mountains have great cascades of granite and the seas rock and swell on both sand and stone.

Everywhere we looked there was the hallmark of fire – where the foresters had used fire to control the coastal scrub from overrunning the heath land, and in the scorched tree tops from the fires that raged out of control in the summer of 2009, it was always in view.

From a rocky platform it was fascinating to look over the forest and see where the fire had moved or not as the mood and wind took it. Sometimes it had raced up to the ridge and leaving the valleys, other times it left a green pocket in a sea of black. We walked through burnt out forest right to the head of Lilly Pilly Gully, which was full of fine fuel but unmarked by fire.

Fire. Try as I might my brain just can’t figure it out.

I am sure there is a lot more to understanding how water moves than I know, but the principles are straight forward and I can apply them in my own backyard. I can get outside with the mattock and chisel channels for the water to flow into. I can watch as water moves around a tiny obstacle and in doing so gouges a path that then become a self-creating route that gets bigger the more the water flows. I can make it make sense to me.

But fire? I believe it works to some principles and rules but I just can’t get a grasp of how they work. I know it goes up hill faster (opposite of water). I know it likes dry, fine fuel. I know it moves in the direction of the wind and that wind is erratic. But I can’t put all the things I know into a comprehensive way of knowing.

Any tips or suggestions?

Posted in Holidays, Love of the land, Understanding Fire | 3 Comments

Melbourne Event
Living with forests: World leading experts discuss impacts of climate change, biodiversity, fire, and industry’
Date: Wednesday 29 September, 2010
Time: 5.30 – 6.30pm
Venue: Carillo Gantner Theatre, Sidney Myer Asia Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville

The University of Melbourne’s School of Land and Environment presents an expert panel discussion, exploring the intricacies of human dependence on forests.

Panellists
Professor Tim Flannery on ‘Climate change and the impacts of changing forests on humans’
Dr William (Bill) Jackson, Deputy Director General, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) on ‘The importance of species and diversity and the impact of changes to humans’
Dr Kevin Tolhurst, Melbourne School of Land and Environment on ‘Living with forests and bushfires’
Veronica Tyquin, Conservation Planner, Forestry Tasmania – ‘Industry perspective’

This panel discussion celebrates the centenary of professional forestry education in Australia, and sets the scene for The Future of Forestry and Forest Science Conference to be held from Thursday 30 September to Saturday 2 October at the University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus.
For more information.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

As the evening drew to a close with a discussion on the role of local government, I was left wanting. Wanting to hear from the other tables in the room and wanting to have the word “Community” descend into our circle and be tugged and pulled into a shape that could give vision for how together we can prepare.

…….In mid sentence a hand came over the top of our heads, removing the words “Fuel Reduction” and depositing the words “Local Government”, along with a sheet referring to the Royal Commission recommendations and posing some questions for our conversation.

It seemed that the discussion they wanted us to have was around the role local government should play in relation to bushfire planning, preparation, response and recovery.

There was a unanimous and resounding rejection of the idea that local government should play a role in ordering evacuation or issuing warnings. There was much discussion about Council’s role in roadside management and also in preparing communities. I ducked off to get a cup of tea and when I returned the councillor at our table was very happily saying the problems could be solved by giving Council more power. We had all definitely agreed local council needed more resources to do what state and federal government asked of it, but more power???

And so we came to end of the topics the Premier wanted our input into. All through the night, Sarah from DHS had been writing notes on butcher’s paper about our discussions. We talked at quite a pace so I don’t know what she captured or if it was a true reflection of the different ideas and viewpoints.

The organisers then briefly offered people a chance to make a comment to the whole meeting. A few people took up the offer but for the most part the comments were about the process, not content. Unfortunately we did not hear about any of the conversations on the other tables, which highlighted the event as an information gathering exercise, (which is what it was billed at so no surprises), not one aimed at building or connecting community.

For me the glaring omission from the whole discussion was the word “Community”. The topics – evacuation, community refuges, powerlines, acquisitions, fuel reduction and local government- literally dropped onto our table by an anonymous hand that removed some papers and delivered new words of focus. And while community was touched on in many, we were never asked how we and our communities could be engaged, educated, consulted or developed to better live with the risk of bushfire. We circled around it, but at no point did we look it squarely in the eye and ask how as a community, can we be better prepared.

In terms of the community consultation process, I was interested to see how people found it. My straw poll found that all the vocal ones were happy, including me, but those who found it harder to participate for one reason or another – not forceful enough (and you did need to be), couldn’t hear with all the background noise, conversation too fast, or any other reasons – did not like the process as much. Overall there was a cynicism about whether anything we said or did would really have an impact.

But I for one was encouraged and heartened by what seemed to be a comprehensive way of gathering community input on, dare I say it, a hot topic.

Posted in Community, Government, Royal Commission | Leave a comment